6th Foundational Falsehood of Creationism



Envoye par: AronRa
Video Description:
Taking on common Creationist canards relating to what evolution is and isn't, and what it does or doesn't depend on or relate to.
Here's the script http://darwinwasright.homestead.com/6thFFoC.html


Tags pour cette video: creationism crevo darwin design evolution intelligent

Voir plus de video de "News" category
Voir plus de videos de AronRa

En relation
Proof of CreationismCreationists Are Right9th Foundational Falsehood of Creationism
proof-of-creationism.htmlproof-of-creationism.htmlproof-of-creationism.html
Creationism Dishonesty and Immorality, Part I.Gdam fackn stupid Bush1st Foundational Falsehood of Creationism
proof-of-creationism.htmlproof-of-creationism.htmlproof-of-creationism.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Commentaire pour cette video: Voir || Cacher
Comments for this video on YouTube
"First of all ... ( 2 weeks ago by AronRa)
"First of all evolution is not a theory."
Yes it is, just like gravity, relativity, and atomic theory are also.
You're absolutely ... ( 2 weeks ago by HighVoltage963)
You're absolutely correct, I made a typo and meant to say "just a theory". I'm a advocate of Evolution in didn't notice ;)
Geology is the ... ( 2 weeks ago by AnnymsVoice)
Geology is the study of earth yet we look to the cosmos for answers. Abiogenesis and evolution go hand in hand you can not have evolution without life from nonliving material to create the beginning of evolution. You claim they are seperate that does not make it true. I argued the law of conservation of matter/mass that something matterless and timeless/eternal created life if matter can not create matter then only the complete opposite something that does not contain matter can create matter.
And could not ... ( 2 weeks ago by AnnymsVoice)
And could not debate this...simple mathematical equation. God = 0m + infinite through the law of conservation of matter/mass lets call this constant G. G = infinite + 0m. Divide both sides by infinte, you gave 0m = 0m. Conclusion 0 = 0 TRUE. Lets check to see of this is correct G - Infinite = 0m. Add infinite to both sides you have G = infinite + 0m TRUE.
As I stated ... ( 2 weeks ago by AnnymsVoice)
As I stated different fields of science are seperated because the ignorance of man. You can not fully understand how the lungs work witout filling them with air linking chemistry and biology together. All scienses are one. Abiogenesis and evolution go hand in hand hypothesis that CAN NOT be proven according to your 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th and now 6th falsehoods. You like to use the words never and ever condradictions of your 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th and now 6th falsehoods. You are more and more a fool.
I only continue ... ( 2 weeks ago by AnnymsVoice)
I only continue watching hoping you can redeem yourself which is possible but the probability is not very likely.
"you can not have ... ( 2 weeks ago by AronRa)
"you can not have evolution without life from nonliving material to create the beginning of evolution." Wrong. You're ignoring what I said (and wrote) from 4:46 to 5:14 and from 9:46 to the end. Excusing for the moment that I don't believe what you say I do. Since you say that "something that does not contain matter can create matter", then explain how your god works.
"And could not ... ( 2 weeks ago by AronRa)
"And could not debate this...simple mathematical equation. God = 0m + infinite through the law of conservation of matter/mass" As your entire position seems dependant on false premises, and you seem to be ignoring everything I said in this video, then I have to wonder if you're not typing your responses while you should be watching and listening.
"hypothesis that ... ( 2 weeks ago by AronRa)
"hypothesis that CAN NOT be proven according to your 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th and now 6th falsehoods." If you would bother to look it up, you would see that in order for any proposed explanation to count as an hypothesis, it must be testable and potentially falsifiable, and I have never contradicted that. So I demand to know where in each of these videos you think I did?
"You like to use ... ( 2 weeks ago by AronRa)
"You like to use the words never and ever condradictions of your 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th and now 6th falsehoods." Where exactly did I supposedly contradict this in each of these videos?
Hey, I really like ... ( 2 weeks ago by StreaksontheChina)
Hey, I really like your videos. Well-written, well-performed, very lucid and stylistically elegant.
people try to put ... ( 2 weeks ago by globetrekker2)
people try to put me down, because I know the truth and everything I say is the truth. Satan is the father of lies and hates the truth. You all on here are the product of your father, the Devil. And you're too dumb to even know it.
excuse my ignorance ... ( 2 weeks ago by Henrythecamel)
excuse my ignorance, but im quite confused by this.. are u tryin to prove god with a mathematical equation? not only that, but an equation with infinity and 0 in it?
I am not trying to ... ( 2 weeks ago by AnnymsVoice)
I am not trying to prove anything...but yes this equation involves infinity and 0.
ah kk.. again plz ... ( 2 weeks ago by Henrythecamel)
ah kk.. again plz excuse my ignorance, its late my brain probably isnt workin right :P but, from a philosophical point of view at least, infinity and nothing r impossibilities.. i mean, they probably work on paper in some way, but have no basis in reality.. unless im missin somethin, it wouldnt be the first time :P exactly what was u implyin with that equation anyways?
a good, well ... ( 2 weeks ago by lewisfitzjohn)
a good, well researched clip. There's only one line I disagree with "if there is a supernatural component to life, science will never be able to detect it". Many things that were once considered supernatural are now understood scientifically. I remember when ball lightning was considered a paranormal phenomenon for example.
on the contrary, ... ( 2 weeks ago by lewisfitzjohn)
on the contrary, infinity only works in reality and not on paper. Take pi for example, mathematically you can keep adding decimal places, but effectively, this is like adding more and more sides to a polygon. It becomes more a more and more accurate circle but will never be completely circular. Yet the circle is one of the most simple of shapes in existence.
Reality it turns ... ( 2 weeks ago by lewisfitzjohn)
Reality it turns out is so bizarre and difficult to comprehend. If it did turn out that ghosts, telepathy or indeed anything ethereal was ever proven scientifically, I wouldnt be at all surprised.
That's really the ... ( 2 weeks ago by Yeeksquilack)
That's really the point, though. Things were *thought* to be supernatural, but they turned out to be natural. For something to qualify as truly supernatural, it cannot ever be explained by science. Supernatural means beyond the realm of science - if science *could* explain the supernatural, then it wouldn't *be* supernatural.
ah kk.. i kinda get ... ( 2 weeks ago by Henrythecamel)
ah kk.. i kinda get what u mean, like a circle is kin to infinity from a mathematical point of view.. not that i would agree a circle is infinity in reality.. but u was talkin about a mathematical equation anyways, so i will just take my ignorant pedantics elsewhere :)
Wow, thanks for the ... ( 1 week ago by ethalin)
Wow, thanks for the input, now, go to bed...
Thank you for these ... ( 1 week ago by ethalin)
Thank you for these videos!
'Microcellular ... ( 1 week ago by Sorastor)
'Microcellular anythings' is now a meme.
Yes, creationists ... ( 3 days ago by BryanEKS89)
Yes, creationists also often confuse Abiogenesis with evolution, and then call evolution, like you said, things like "change" and "adaption".



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code