Tags vuoo:

Categories:

Rebuttal to "25 Questions for Evolutionists".



Envoye par: DonExodus2
Video Description:
Links:
Natural Selection http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gL0tmb3Evhc
Eye- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duBW9QabXfw Abiogenesis- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhWds7djuWo Mutations- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGFvK77Fsz8 Embryology- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eblrphIwoJQ Same designer, same genes- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Izl5BB2AkZE Cheetah- h
ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIlWKp44T50 Transitional Fossils Playlist- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4GdZOlPrX8 &feature=PlayList&p=F9729F67CD4034C9&index=0&playnext=1


Tags pour cette video: charles creationism darwin design Evolution hovind intelligent kent refuted

Voir plus de video de "Tech" category
Voir plus de videos de DonExodus2

En relation
Creationism Dishonesty and Immorality, Part I.Ten Questions For CreationistsLets Test Them: Evolution vs. Creationism
creationism-dishonesty-and-immorality-part-i.htmlcreationism-dishonesty-and-immorality-part-i.htmlcreationism-dishonesty-and-immorality-part-i.html
Proof of Evolution - Part 4 EmbryologyTransitional Fossils I - NEWThe Evolution of Homosexuality
creationism-dishonesty-and-immorality-part-i.htmlcreationism-dishonesty-and-immorality-part-i.htmlcreationism-dishonesty-and-immorality-part-i.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Commentaire pour cette video: Voir || Cacher
Comments for this video on YouTube
Blackbelt, I told ... ( 1 month ago by DonExodus2)
Blackbelt, I told you Behe accepts evolution, why list that book?
I list the book ... ( 1 month ago by BlackBeltNumber3)
I list the book because I think there is enough evidence to support Behe's theory of Irreducible complexity which I really don't want to argue with you about. Because then you'll start going into peer reviewed papers that don't support IC and peer reviewed or not Behe is fucking brilliant. So, if evolution isn't random then who or what makes it happen?
Look, do a quick ... ( 1 month ago by DonExodus2)
Look, do a quick search of Ken Miller and flagella. Bottom line is that IC is based on a misunderstanding of evolution, and that misunderstanding is what creates it to be false. Then again, like you mentioned, even the brilliant Behe accepts us sharing a common ancestor with the great apes. Natural selection is a non-random process.
So what drives this ... ( 1 month ago by BlackBeltNumber3)
So what drives this non-random process... Nature?
To an extent- ... ( 1 month ago by DonExodus2)
To an extent- moreso mathematical probabilities.
Is there a ... ( 1 month ago by matias2309)
Is there a creationism factory that spits out creationists? I mean...it's been disproved *every* time and yet they keep coming, hordes and hordes of 'em...clamoring old-age arguments like they were new! I think there is only one rational answer: God made them!
To DonExodus2: ... ( 1 month ago by BlackBeltNumber3)
To DonExodus2: I'm looking forward to researching moreso mathematical probabilities. Thank you for the education. Take care.
Actually, CDK007 ... ( 1 month ago by DonExodus2)
Actually, CDK007 has a nice demonstration of this using computer models, showing how due to natural selection, mutations do not run amok in a population.
How would ... ( 1 month ago by bendiblestraw)
How would reproduction have existed before life existed? I would like to see that explained seeing as it makes absolutely no sense. Also, just because you talk fast, speak arrogantly, and dumb things down to make everything seem like common sense. You are much more of a lawyer than a scientist. If you have any new material that hasnt been heard and disproven please post another video.
Wow i couldn't have ... ( 1 month ago by bendiblestraw)
Wow i couldn't have put it any better myself, we have our athiest evolutionists and God plus evolution evolutionists. I would say that theyre argument plays a much bigger part than God believing evolutionists versus creationists. This is not new information, and time will just prove this nonsense wrong. You could call this the evolution( or de-evolution) of science. Bias plays a much bigger role than it did in earlier history simply because of fame, fortune, and the want for not having God.
//How would ... ( 1 month ago by DonExodus2)
//How would reproduction have existed before life existed?//\ Look at prions. //If you have any new material that hasnt been heard and disproven please post another video. // Made me lol. I'm sorry, you said something about arrogance?
Arrogant twat. ... ( 1 month ago by hoadmaback)
Arrogant twat. Stick yer bible up yer arse.
(and I wrote that slowly for you)
No offence intended ... ( 1 month ago by hoadmaback)
No offence intended DonEx.......
//How would ... ( 1 month ago by Davidizer)
//How would reproduction have existed before life existed?/ Look at prions.\\ Don't prions, like viruses, require living cells for reproduction? Prions are misfolded versions of normal proteins found in living cells, they came after life, not before.
This video is ... ( 1 month ago by t3tsuyaguy1)
This video is fascinating. I commend your breakdown of these questions. One small critique. Someone without a working scientific vocabulary would have trouble following what you're saying. I have friends who would find this information interesting, but they would be totally confused by about two minutes into this video.
DonExodus2 said: " ... ( 2 weeks ago by BloodStainedLamb)
DonExodus2 said: "Look at prions." Davidizer said: "Don't prions, like viruses, require living cells for reproduction? Prions are misfolded versions of normal proteins found in living cells, they came after life, not before." where's the rest of this argument stemmed off the question "How would reproduction have existed before life existed?" genuinely curious.
bravo i'm ... ( 1 week ago by GodKillerAtheist)
bravo i'm Favoritizing this shit WOOT! And yes I just made up a new word.
Thousands of ... ( 1 week ago by costa200)
Thousands of scientists you say!!??? Funny, i have a biology degree and have still to find a single one of those thousands. Where are they hiding?
A biologist isn't a ... ( 1 week ago by BlackBeltNumber3)
A biologist isn't a real scientist.
Thanks for playing... try again and put in another quarter.
Well, that is what ... ( 6 days ago by alcari)
Well, that is what us physicist say about most of the other sciences. Either that or they're just pretend-physicists.
When we say it, it's a joke of course. Biologists are just as much scientists as chemists, physicists, astronomers, computer scientists etc etc.
Well... I would ... ( 5 days ago by KPhysicsGeek)
Well... I would agree up to the computer scientists... CS is just the bastard child of math and Physics ;-)
Now would that be a ... ( 2 days ago by sleepyriggles)
Now would that be a form of creationism or did the word favorite evolve :P
it evolved ( 2 days ago by GodKillerAtheist)
it evolved
This has to be the ... ( 2 days ago by GodKillerAtheist)
This has to be the nastiest post I've read all day..but you're totally correct.



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code